Skip to main content

Civil War Letters

Alexander Grelier
9/20/18

Civil War Letters

Captain Charles M. Scott sends a letter to his wife, Anna on April 7, 1862. In this letter he speaks about a terrible and persistent attack that would most likely cause great loss on both sides. There are many wounded and dead men, but he believes his men will be able to hold their own. He sits down the next day and finishes the letter saying that he had undergone great deals of stress.

Hazard Stevens sends a letter to his mother Margaret Stevens on July 13, 1863 regarding the current status of his division in the military. He says that he is stationed and is waiting for a division of troops to be transported to Portsmouth, and hopes to escape going there.


Soldier James A. Sayles sends a letter to his sweetheart, Florence Lee, on May 15, 1864. He tells her about the start of his campaign, noting the many engagements with the enemy that he had experienced since the campaign opened.
Captain William McMicken sends a letter to his daughter Nellie on July 31, 1864. His daughter was most likely too young to read at the time, stating that her mother will likely read it to her. He tells her that he isn’t feeling great, he wishes he could see her, and speaks about a small slave boy he wants to take home if he is able to.

In the first letter I found, soldier William H. Smith sends it back home to his friends on April 9, 1865 about the stress of war on him and what was going on in battle in his past few days. He speaks on how he misses lots of things about home, even stating that he could sit down and have tea which is something he usually wouldn’t do. Throughout the letter explains to his friends that life on the battlefield is treacherous, but he is adapting quite well. This collection of letters written by five different soldiers during the Civil War depicts life on the battlefield, and the severity of every situation. In all of the letters, we can clearly detect the severe stress put on all soldiers, no matter if they are on the front lines at the time or not. All of the letters were written between 1862 and 1865, and provide evidence straight from the soldiers themselves on what life was like, speaking directly to their closest friends and family. These soldiers wrote home because they are aware that these close friends and family are worried sick, and are trying to let them know exactly how they are doing. While some like Captain Charles M. Scott seem to be very honest about the terrible things that are happening to and around them, some like soldier William H. Smith send letters home saying that they are adapting very well despite the extremities of war. This shows that what the soldiers are saying in the letters could be quite different from what they were actually experiencing. Most men at war know that death was very well possible at any time, and know that they might not be able to speak to their families again. Did the soldiers not tell their families the complete truth just to keep them from worrying? Was there more violence and stress than what was mentioned? Because of modern technology, it is much easier for a soldier to see and contact family if deployed at war. Is it easier or harder for a soldier in modern day to keep their families from worrying?

Sources


University of Washington, Civil War Letters Collection This website is where I found all of the letters used in this post!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Drug Treatment vs. Punishment

Alexander Grelier 4/9/19 Drug Treatment vs. Punishment National Institute on Drug Abuse Transforming the System: Americans Support Prevention, Rehabilitation and Reintegration The Hamilton Project Since the Harrison Narcotics Act in 1914, the United States drug policy has mostly come down on punishment for drug related crimes rather than treatment. In recent years, the debate on drug treatment versus punishment has been very prevalent in the US, because of the growing number of arrests related to drugs and alcohol. For example, In Somerset County, Pennsylvania, 76% of cases have been drug related. These types of scenarios have caused great stress financially for the country and for law enforcement that have had to be educated on how each and every substance affects inmates. In many cases, white people seem to be treated for drug possession and use, while African-Americans and Hispanics are punished. With this being said, I do think the EJI is doing great with

Case Study: Source Use & Citation - Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiment

Alexander Grelier 9/3/18 Case Study: Source Use & Citation Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiment https://psmag.com/social-justice/electric-schlock-65377 1.  From analyzing Bess' work with his sources, what standards or rules does he seem to be following for citing his work? What information is provided the first or second or third (etc.) time a source is noted?  - When Bess sites the work he is taking examples or inspiration from, the first time he sites the title, author, publication date, and the publisher. When siting the same work a second time, he only uses the author and title in his sources. If he ends up having to cite it three times, he will use the term "Ibid", which means that it already been cited in a previous note. 2.  Bess' work provides us with example of "Annotated" notes. (Examples: 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 25). Based on these examples, what do you understand annotated to mean? - My understanding of the word "a